SuperCopy Reviews Rss Feedhttp://www.codeplex.com/SuperCopy/Release/ProjectReleases.aspxSuperCopy Reviews Rss DescriptionReviewed: 0.61 Production (May 30, 2009)http://supercopy.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=1991Rated 3 Stars (out of 5) - + Great effort
+ Great job in help files and comments sections
- Robocopy.exe is much greater/faster and should be used instead of xcopy
- The library /core functions should use prototype and the coding is more less slow, bad structure and should use OOP for Javascript.
- The GUI is confusing and missing remote copy or UNC copy
- There should only be one HTA for execution, log, help etc.woowilSat, 30 May 2009 12:35:08 GMTReviewed: 0.61 Production (May 30, 2009) 20090530123508PReviewed: 0.61 Production (May 30, 2009)http://supercopy.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=1991Rated 2 Stars (out of 5) - + Great effort
+ Great job in help files and comments sections
- Robocopy.exe from much greater/faster and should be used instead of xcopy
- The library functions should use prototype and the coding is more less slow, bad structure and should use OOP for Javascript
- The GUI is confusing and missing remote copy or UNC copy
- The should only be one HTA for execution, log, help etcwoowilSat, 30 May 2009 12:32:31 GMTReviewed: 0.61 Production (May 30, 2009) 20090530123231P